Demographics details for Essex junction, VT vs Colleyville, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Essex junction, VT vs Colleyville, TX.

Data Essex junction Colleyville
Population 10,917 25,850
Median Age 39.9 years 47.3 years
Median Income $92,589 $196,298
Married Families 46.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Essex junction vs Colleyville

  • The population in Colleyville is higher at 25,850, compared to 10,917 in Essex junction.
  • The median age in Colleyville is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 39.9 years in Essex junction.
  • Colleyville has a higher median income of $196,298, compared to $92,589 in Essex junction.
  • In Colleyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 46.0% in Essex junction.
  • Essex junction has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Colleyville.
  • Colleyville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Essex junction.

Demographics

Demographics Essex junction vs Colleyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Essex junction Colleyville
Black 3 4
White 79 72
Asian 8 8
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Essex junction vs Colleyville

  • In Colleyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Essex junction.
  • Essex junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 72% in Colleyville.
  • Both Essex junction and Colleyville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 8%.
  • Colleyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Essex junction.
  • Both Essex junction and Colleyville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Essex junction and Colleyville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Essex junction Colleyville
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 13.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 7.3%
Depression 27.1% 21.5%
Smoking 11.8% 8.7%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 19.5%
Obesity 26.4% 27.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Essex junction vs Colleyville

  • More residents in Essex junction report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Colleyville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Essex junction at 27.1% compared to 21.5% in Colleyville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Essex junction at 11.8% compared to 8.7% in Colleyville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 19.5% in Colleyville.
  • Colleyville has higher obesity rates at 27.3% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Essex junction at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Colleyville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Essex junction Colleyville
No Schooling 1.5% (162) 0.2% (47)
High School Diploma 8.2% (899) 3.6% (936)
Less than High School 8.8% (966) 0.8% (208)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.3% (3,742) 49.3% (12,744)

Education Levels Comparison: Essex junction vs Colleyville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Colleyville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Essex junction hold a high school diploma at 8.2% compared to 3.6% in Colleyville.
  • More residents in Essex junction have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 0.8% in Colleyville.
  • In Colleyville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 34.3% in Essex junction.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.