Demographics details for Erwin, TN vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Erwin, TN vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Erwin | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,953 | 994 |
| Median Age | 46.8 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $40,670 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Erwin vs Mc graw
- In Erwin, the population is higher at 5,953, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Erwin have a higher median age of 46.8 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $40,670 in Erwin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Erwin at 48.0% compared to 38.0% in Mc graw.
- Erwin has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in Erwin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Erwin vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Erwin | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Erwin vs Mc graw
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Erwin and Mc graw at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to 87% in Erwin.
- Both Erwin and Mc graw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Erwin at 8% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 5% in Erwin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Erwin and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Erwin | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 29.7% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 23.6% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Erwin vs Mc graw
- More residents in Erwin report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Depression is more prevalent in Erwin at 29.7% compared to 25.5% in Mc graw.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Erwin at 23.6% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 15.9% in Erwin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Erwin at 38.0% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- Disability percentages are higher in Erwin at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Erwin | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (15) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (1,201) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (1,170) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (698) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Erwin vs Mc graw
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Erwin and Mc graw at 0.3%.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 20.2% in Erwin.
- More residents in Erwin have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 15.1% in Mc graw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Erwin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.