Demographics details for Erwin, TN vs Chandlerville, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Erwin, TN vs Chandlerville, IL.
Data | Erwin | Chandlerville |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,953 | 514 |
Median Age | 46.8 years | 44.8 years |
Median Income | $40,670 | $42,031 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Erwin vs Chandlerville
- In Erwin, the population is higher at 5,953, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
- Residents in Erwin have a higher median age of 46.8 years compared to 44.8 years in Chandlerville.
- Chandlerville has a higher median income of $42,031, compared to $40,670 in Erwin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Erwin at 48.0% compared to 38.0% in Chandlerville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Erwin and Chandlerville at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Erwin is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.
Demographics
Demographics Erwin vs Chandlerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Erwin | Chandlerville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 96 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Erwin vs Chandlerville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Erwin and Chandlerville at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandlerville at 96% compared to 87% in Erwin.
- Both Erwin and Chandlerville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Erwin at 8% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Erwin at 5% compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
- In Chandlerville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Erwin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Erwin | Chandlerville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.3% |
Depression | 29.7% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 23.6% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 35.6% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Erwin vs Chandlerville
- More residents in Erwin report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.9% in Chandlerville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Erwin at 29.7% compared to 22.9% in Chandlerville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Erwin at 23.6% compared to 18.3% in Chandlerville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Erwin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Erwin at 38.0% compared to 35.6% in Chandlerville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Erwin and Chandlerville at 21.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Erwin | Chandlerville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (15) | 1.0% (5) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (1,201) | 30.9% (159) |
Less than High School | 19.7% (1,170) | 41.2% (212) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (698) | 4.1% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Erwin vs Chandlerville
- In Chandlerville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Erwin.
- In Chandlerville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.9% compared to 20.2% in Erwin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandlerville at 41.2%, compared to 19.7% in Erwin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Erwin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.