Environment details: Erskine MN
Fairly good quality; local oversight noted.
Environment details: Winters TX
Poor quality; need for improvement noted.
Compare Environment: Erskine MN vs Winters TX
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Erskine | Winters |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 5308 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Fairly good quality; local oversight noted. | Poor quality; need for improvement noted. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.56 | 1.68 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 8 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Erskine vs Winters
- Water quality is rated higher in Erskine at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Winters.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Winters with an average index of 1.68 compared to 1.56 in Erskine.
- Winters experiences more days with poor air quality at 21 compared to 8 in Erskine.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.