Demographics details for Epsom, NH vs Fitzgerald, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Epsom, NH vs Fitzgerald, GA.
| Data | Epsom | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,756 | 8,900 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,000 | $32,500 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 1.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Epsom vs Fitzgerald
- The population in Fitzgerald is higher at 8,900, compared to 4,756 in Epsom.
- Residents in Epsom have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 35.3 years in Fitzgerald.
- Epsom has a higher median income of $71,000 compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Epsom at 65.0% compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
- The poverty level is higher in Fitzgerald at 18%, compared to 5% in Epsom.
- Fitzgerald has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 1.9% in Epsom.
Demographics
Demographics Epsom vs Fitzgerald provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Epsom | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 55 |
| White | 98 | 42 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Epsom vs Fitzgerald
- In Fitzgerald, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 1% in Epsom.
- Epsom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
- Both Epsom and Fitzgerald have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Fitzgerald has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fitzgerald at 1%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Epsom and Fitzgerald at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Epsom | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Epsom vs Fitzgerald
- In Fitzgerald, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fitzgerald at 22.4% versus 0.0% in Epsom.
- Fitzgerald has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fitzgerald at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Fitzgerald has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fitzgerald at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Epsom | Fitzgerald |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (41) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 32.9% (2,930) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.1% (992) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.3% (828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Epsom vs Fitzgerald
- In Fitzgerald, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Fitzgerald, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fitzgerald at 11.1%, compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Fitzgerald, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.