Demographics details for Epsom, NH vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Epsom, NH vs Federal way, WA.
Data | Epsom | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,756 | 97,863 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $71,000 | $80,360 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 1.9 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Epsom vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 4,756 in Epsom.
- Residents in Epsom have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $71,000 in Epsom.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Epsom at 65.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 5% in Epsom.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 1.9% in Epsom.
Demographics
Demographics Epsom vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Epsom | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 17 |
White | 98 | 34 |
Asian | 1 | 15 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 19 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Epsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Epsom.
- Epsom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Epsom.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Epsom | Federal way |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.9% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.7% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.5% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Epsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 0.0% in Epsom.
- Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Federal way has higher obesity rates at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Epsom | Federal way |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (1,735) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.3% (15,003) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.0% (10,805) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Epsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.