Demographics details for Epsom, NH vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Epsom, NH vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Epsom | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,756 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $71,000 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 1.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Epsom vs Cochran
- In Epsom, the population is higher at 4,756, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Epsom have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Epsom has a higher median income of $71,000 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Epsom at 65.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 5% in Epsom.
- Cochran has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 1.9% in Epsom.
Demographics
Demographics Epsom vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Epsom | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 53 |
| White | 98 | 40 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Epsom vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 1% in Epsom.
- Epsom has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Epsom.
- Cochran has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cochran at 3%, compared to 0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Epsom and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Epsom | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Epsom vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 0.0% in Epsom.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochran at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Epsom | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Epsom vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
- In Cochran, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Epsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.