Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Webster, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Webster, FL.
Data | Ephrata | Webster |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,476 | 878 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $57,958 | $53,125 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Webster
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 878 in Webster.
- The median age in Webster is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $53,125 in Webster.
- In Webster, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Webster at 12%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Webster.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Webster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ephrata | Webster |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 15 |
White | 63 | 75 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 25 | 62 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 31 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Webster
- In Webster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Webster at 75% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Ephrata and Webster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Webster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Webster at 31%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Webster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ephrata | Webster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.6% |
Depression | 27.0% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 26.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Webster
- In Webster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 20.6% in Webster.
- Webster has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Webster.
- Webster has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Webster at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ephrata | Webster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 5.8% (51) |
High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 32.9% (289) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 36.4% (320) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 9.3% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Webster
- In Webster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.8% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Webster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Webster at 36.4%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Webster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.