Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Talladega, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Talladega, AL.
| Data | Ephrata | Talladega |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 14,674 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $37,945 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Talladega
- The population in Talladega is higher at 14,674, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Talladega is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $37,945 in Talladega.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephrata at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Talladega.
- The poverty level is higher in Talladega at 18%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Talladega.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Talladega provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Talladega |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 55 |
| White | 63 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Talladega
- In Talladega, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 36% in Talladega.
- Both Ephrata and Talladega have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 6% in Talladega.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 3% in Talladega.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Talladega at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Talladega |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 45.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Talladega
- In Talladega, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 22.7% in Talladega.
- Talladega has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Talladega.
- Talladega has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Talladega at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Talladega |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.9% (273) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 19.3% (2,827) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 26.2% (3,843) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 9.4% (1,374) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Talladega
- In Talladega, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Talladega, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Talladega at 26.2%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Talladega, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.