Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs South salt lake, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs South salt lake, UT.
| Data | Ephrata | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 26,003 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $57,125 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs South salt lake
- The population in South salt lake is higher at 26,003, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Ephrata have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephrata at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
- Ephrata has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in South salt lake.
- South salt lake has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs South salt lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 63 | 43 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 10 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 43% in South salt lake.
- In South salt lake, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- South salt lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 9% in South salt lake.
- In South salt lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 26.6% in South salt lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ephrata at 35.1% compared to 34.2% in South salt lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South salt lake at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.4% (374) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 16.1% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 16.8% (4,371) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 18.9% (4,906) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South salt lake at 16.8%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In South salt lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.