Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Panama, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Panama, IA.
| Data | Ephrata | Panama |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 231 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $69,250 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Panama
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 231 in Panama.
- The median age in Panama is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Panama has a higher median income of $69,250, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- In Panama, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Panama.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Panama.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Panama provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Panama |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Panama
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ephrata at 1% compared to 0% in Panama.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panama at 98% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Ephrata and Panama have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 0% in Panama.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 1% in Panama.
- In Panama, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Panama |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 22.5% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Panama
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.8% in Panama.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 18.7% in Panama.
- Panama has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panama at 22.5% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Panama has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ephrata at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Panama.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Panama |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 21.6% (50) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 5.2% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 9.5% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Panama
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Panama.
- In Panama, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- More residents in Ephrata have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 5.2% in Panama.
- In Panama, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.5% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.