Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Marion junction, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Marion junction, AL.

Data Ephrata Marion junction
Population 8,476 1,904
Median Age 33.4 years 38.0 years
Median Income $57,958 $50,000
Married Families 33.0% 300.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Marion junction

  • In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 1,904 in Marion junction.
  • The median age in Marion junction is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
  • Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $50,000 in Marion junction.
  • In Marion junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 300.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
  • The poverty level is higher in Marion junction at 12%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
  • Marion junction has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.

Demographics

Demographics Ephrata vs Marion junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ephrata Marion junction
Black 1 280
White 63 1000
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 25 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 50
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Marion junction

  • In Marion junction, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 280% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Marion junction at 1000% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
  • Both Ephrata and Marion junction have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 0% in Marion junction.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marion junction at 50%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Marion junction at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ephrata Marion junction
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 27.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 35.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 8.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Marion junction

  • More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ephrata at 35.1% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Ephrata at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ephrata Marion junction
No Schooling 0.8% (65) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.7% (1,503) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 14.4% (1,223) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.0% (677) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Marion junction

  • A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • More residents in Ephrata have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Marion junction.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.