Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Lubbock, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Lubbock, TX.
| Data | Ephrata | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 263,930 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $58,734 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Lubbock
- The population in Lubbock is higher at 263,930, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Ephrata have a higher median age of 33.4 years compared to 30.0 years in Lubbock.
- Lubbock has a higher median income of $58,734, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephrata at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Lubbock.
- The poverty level is higher in Lubbock at 16%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Lubbock.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Lubbock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 63 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 38% in Lubbock.
- In Lubbock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- Lubbock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lubbock at 13%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- In Lubbock, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 24.6% in Lubbock.
- Lubbock has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lubbock at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Lubbock has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lubbock at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.0% (2,543) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 11.1% (29,368) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 12.3% (32,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 19.5% (51,422) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 11.1% in Lubbock.
- More residents in Ephrata have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 12.3% in Lubbock.
- In Lubbock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.