Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Logsden, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Logsden, OR.
| Data | Ephrata | Logsden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 12 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 6.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Logsden
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 12 in Logsden.
- The median age in Logsden is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $50,000 in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephrata at 33.0% compared to 6.0% in Logsden.
- Ephrata has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Logsden.
- Logsden has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Logsden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Logsden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Logsden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ephrata at 1% compared to 0% in Logsden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Logsden at 90% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Ephrata and Logsden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 5% in Logsden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 5% in Logsden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Logsden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Logsden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Logsden
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ephrata at 35.1% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ephrata at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Logsden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Logsden
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- More residents in Ephrata have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Logsden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.