Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Lake arthur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Lake arthur, LA.
| Data | Ephrata | Lake arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 2,594 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $43,625 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Lake arthur
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 2,594 in Lake arthur.
- The median age in Lake arthur is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $43,625 in Lake arthur.
- In Lake arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Lake arthur at 13%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- Lake arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Lake arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Lake arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 63 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake arthur at 83% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Ephrata and Lake arthur have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 7% in Lake arthur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 3% in Lake arthur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Lake arthur at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Lake arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 28.6% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake arthur at 28.6% versus 27.0% in Ephrata.
- Lake arthur has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake arthur at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Lake arthur has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake arthur at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Lake arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.5% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 18.9% (490) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 35.5% (920) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 5.7% (149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Lake arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lake arthur at 35.5%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 5.7% in Lake arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.