Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Indio, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Indio, CA.
| Data | Ephrata | Indio |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 91,980 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $68,436 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Indio
- The population in Indio is higher at 91,980, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Indio is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Indio has a higher median income of $68,436, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- In Indio, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Indio at 15%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- Indio has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Indio provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Indio |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 63 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 28 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Indio
- In Indio, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 10% in Indio.
- In Indio, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- Indio has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Indio at 28%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- In Indio, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Indio |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Indio
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Indio.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 17.2% in Indio.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Indio.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 15.8% in Indio.
- Indio has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Indio at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Indio |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.7% (1,557) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 19.6% (18,009) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 30.1% (27,650) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 13.1% (12,045) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Indio
- In Indio, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Indio, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Indio at 30.1%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Indio, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.