Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Galveston, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Galveston, TX.
| Data | Ephrata | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 53,089 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $57,453 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Galveston
- The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Galveston is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958 compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 16 |
| White | 63 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Galveston
- In Galveston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- In Galveston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Galveston
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 21.7% in Galveston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 16.8% in Galveston.
- Galveston has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 1.6% (823) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 13.8% (7,336) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 16.6% (8,791) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 23.2% (12,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Galveston
- In Galveston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Galveston at 16.6%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Galveston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.