Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Fleischmanns, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Fleischmanns, NY.
| Data | Ephrata | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,476 | 230 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 49.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,958 | $60,417 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Fleischmanns
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- The median age in Fleischmanns is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Fleischmanns has a higher median income of $60,417, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Fleischmanns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephrata | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 35 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Fleischmanns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ephrata at 1% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- Both Ephrata and Fleischmanns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fleischmanns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 35%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephrata | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Fleischmanns
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Fleischmanns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 23.7% in Fleischmanns.
- Fleischmanns has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ephrata at 35.1% compared to 35.0% in Fleischmanns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephrata | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 4.3% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 20.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 21.7% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 37.0% (85) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Fleischmanns
- In Fleischmanns, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Fleischmanns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fleischmanns at 21.7%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Fleischmanns, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.