Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Avon lake, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Avon lake, OH.
Data | Ephrata | Avon lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,476 | 25,617 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $57,958 | $103,946 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Avon lake
- The population in Avon lake is higher at 25,617, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Avon lake is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Avon lake has a higher median income of $103,946, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- In Avon lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Avon lake.
- The unemployment rate in Ephrata is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Avon lake.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Avon lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ephrata | Avon lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 63 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Avon lake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ephrata and Avon lake at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Avon lake at 91% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- In Avon lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ephrata at 25% compared to 2% in Avon lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 3% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Avon lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ephrata | Avon lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.8% |
Depression | 27.0% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 13.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Avon lake
- More residents in Ephrata report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.4% in Avon lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 21.3% in Avon lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ephrata at 17.0% compared to 13.6% in Avon lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Avon lake at 21.0% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ephrata at 35.1% compared to 32.4% in Avon lake.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ephrata and Avon lake at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ephrata | Avon lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 0.3% (84) |
High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 10.7% (2,732) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 2.8% (722) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 38.3% (9,818) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Avon lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Avon lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 10.7% in Avon lake.
- More residents in Ephrata have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 2.8% in Avon lake.
- In Avon lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.