Demographics details for Ephraim, WI vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephraim, WI vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Ephraim | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 346 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 63.9 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $72,292 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Ephraim vs Richland
- The population in Richland is higher at 7,297, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- Residents in Ephraim have a higher median age of 63.9 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephraim at 58.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Ephraim.
Demographics
Demographics Ephraim vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephraim | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 19 |
| White | 96 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephraim vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Ephraim has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 74% in Richland.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Ephraim.
- Richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephraim at 4% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephraim and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephraim | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.7% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 31.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephraim vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 21.1% in Ephraim.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 31.7% in Ephraim.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ephraim at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephraim | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 4.3% (15) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (8) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 59.5% (206) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephraim vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephraim hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.