Demographics details for Ephraim, WI vs Jessup, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephraim, WI vs Jessup, PA.
Data | Ephraim | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Population | 346 | 4,488 |
Median Age | 63.9 years | 44.9 years |
Median Income | $72,292 | $58,869 |
Married Families | 58.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Ephraim vs Jessup
- The population in Jessup is higher at 4,488, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- Residents in Ephraim have a higher median age of 63.9 years compared to 44.9 years in Jessup.
- Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292 compared to $58,869 in Jessup.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephraim at 58.0% compared to 34.0% in Jessup.
- The poverty level is higher in Jessup at 11%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Jessup has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Ephraim.
Demographics
Demographics Ephraim vs Jessup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ephraim | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 96 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephraim vs Jessup
- In Jessup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Ephraim has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 76% in Jessup.
- In Jessup, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ephraim.
- Jessup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jessup at 13%, compared to 4% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephraim and Jessup at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ephraim | Jessup |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 10.4% |
Depression | 21.1% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 11.2% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 25.7% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephraim vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jessup at 23.0% versus 21.1% in Ephraim.
- Jessup has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 18.6% in Jessup.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ephraim at 31.7% compared to 31.1% in Jessup.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ephraim and Jessup at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ephraim | Jessup |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (31) |
High School Diploma | 4.3% (15) | 27.2% (1,221) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (8) | 11.1% (498) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 59.5% (206) | 19.0% (852) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephraim vs Jessup
- In Jessup, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
- In Jessup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jessup at 11.1%, compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephraim hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 19.0% in Jessup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.