Demographics details for Ephraim, WI vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephraim, WI vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | Ephraim | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 346 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 63.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,292 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Ephraim vs Clarksdale
- The population in Clarksdale is higher at 13,969, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- Residents in Ephraim have a higher median age of 63.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ephraim at 58.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.5% in Ephraim.
Demographics
Demographics Ephraim vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ephraim | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 86 |
| White | 96 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephraim vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- Ephraim has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both Ephraim and Clarksdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Clarksdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephraim at 4% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephraim and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ephraim | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 25.7% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 31.7% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephraim vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephraim at 21.1% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 31.7% in Ephraim.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ephraim and Clarksdale at 19.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ephraim | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 4.3% (15) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (8) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 59.5% (206) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephraim vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
- In Clarksdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.2% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephraim hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.