Demographics details for Enon valley, PA vs Mendenhall, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Enon valley, PA vs Mendenhall, MS.

Data Enon valley Mendenhall
Population 295 2,148
Median Age 41.7 years 39.0 years
Median Income $56,875 $35,956
Married Families 50.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 20%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 5.5

Population Comparison: Enon valley vs Mendenhall

  • The population in Mendenhall is higher at 2,148, compared to 295 in Enon valley.
  • Residents in Enon valley have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
  • Enon valley has a higher median income of $56,875 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Enon valley at 50.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 0% in Enon valley.
  • Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in Enon valley.

Demographics

Demographics Enon valley vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Enon valley Mendenhall
Black Data is updating 65
White 74 34
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 20 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Enon valley vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 0% in Enon valley.
  • Enon valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • The Asian population is larger in Enon valley at 6% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Enon valley and Mendenhall at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Enon valley at 20% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Enon valley and Mendenhall at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Enon valley Mendenhall
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 14.6%
Depression 23.6% 24.8%
Smoking 19.6% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 20.0% 13.7%
Obesity 35.1% 46.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Enon valley vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.0% in Enon valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 23.6% in Enon valley.
  • Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 19.6% in Enon valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Enon valley at 20.0% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 35.1% in Enon valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 15.0% in Enon valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Enon valley Mendenhall
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (16)
High School Diploma 21.4% (63) 17.9% (385)
Less than High School 8.5% (25) 20.7% (445)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (42) 18.4% (395)

Education Levels Comparison: Enon valley vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Enon valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Enon valley hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 17.9% in Mendenhall.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 8.5% in Enon valley.
  • In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 14.2% in Enon valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.