Demographics details for Elsinore, UT vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elsinore, UT vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Elsinore | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 865 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 50.4 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $53,929 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Elsinore vs Griffin
- The population in Griffin is higher at 23,693, compared to 865 in Elsinore.
- Residents in Elsinore have a higher median age of 50.4 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Elsinore has a higher median income of $53,929 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elsinore at 48.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 9% in Elsinore.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Elsinore.
Demographics
Demographics Elsinore vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elsinore | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 52 |
| White | 82 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Elsinore vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 0% in Elsinore.
- Elsinore has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- Both Elsinore and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elsinore at 10% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- Both Elsinore and Griffin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Elsinore at 2% compared to 1% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elsinore | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elsinore vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Elsinore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elsinore at 26.3% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 13.5% in Elsinore.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Griffin at 13.4% compared to 13.0% in Elsinore.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 37.1% in Elsinore.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elsinore at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elsinore | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 22.9% (198) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (57) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (89) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elsinore vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Elsinore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elsinore hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 22.6% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 6.6% in Elsinore.
- In Griffin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.3% in Elsinore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.