Demographics details for Elm city, NC vs Fairview heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Elm city, NC vs Fairview heights, IL.

Data Elm city Fairview heights
Population 1,204 16,324
Median Age 48.0 years 40.0 years
Median Income $48,125 $74,038
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 15% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Elm city vs Fairview heights

  • The population in Fairview heights is higher at 16,324, compared to 1,204 in Elm city.
  • Residents in Elm city have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 40.0 years in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $48,125 in Elm city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Elm city at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Elm city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Elm city is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Elm city vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Elm city Fairview heights
Black 60 30
White 25 54
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 11 3
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Elm city vs Fairview heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Elm city at 60% compared to 30% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairview heights at 54% compared to 25% in Elm city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Elm city at 3% compared to 1% in Fairview heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Elm city at 11% compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 1% in Elm city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elm city and Fairview heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Elm city Fairview heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.5%
Depression 21.2% 19.0%
Smoking 18.8% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 16.8%
Obesity 37.9% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Elm city vs Fairview heights

  • More residents in Elm city report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Elm city at 21.2% compared to 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Elm city at 18.8% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 15.7% in Elm city.
  • Fairview heights has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 37.9% in Elm city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Elm city at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Elm city Fairview heights
No Schooling 0.7% (8) 1.0% (168)
High School Diploma 24.1% (290) 14.5% (2,359)
Less than High School 15.1% (182) 7.3% (1,187)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.5% (139) 22.0% (3,596)

Education Levels Comparison: Elm city vs Fairview heights

  • In Fairview heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Elm city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Elm city hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents in Elm city have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 11.5% in Elm city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.