Demographics details for Elm city, NC vs Brookhaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elm city, NC vs Brookhaven, MS.
Data | Elm city | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,204 | 11,608 |
Median Age | 48.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $48,125 | $32,869 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Elm city vs Brookhaven
- The population in Brookhaven is higher at 11,608, compared to 1,204 in Elm city.
- Residents in Elm city have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 42.0 years in Brookhaven.
- Elm city has a higher median income of $48,125 compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elm city at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 20%, compared to 15% in Elm city.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Elm city and Brookhaven at 5.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Elm city vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Elm city | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Black | 60 | 57 |
White | 25 | 39 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 11 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elm city vs Brookhaven
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Elm city at 60% compared to 57% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookhaven at 39% compared to 25% in Elm city.
- The Asian population is larger in Elm city at 3% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elm city at 11% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Elm city at 1% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elm city and Brookhaven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Elm city | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.6% |
Depression | 21.2% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 37.9% | 45.4% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elm city vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.8% in Elm city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookhaven at 21.5% versus 21.2% in Elm city.
- Brookhaven has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 18.8% in Elm city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Elm city at 15.7% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 37.9% in Elm city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elm city at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Brookhaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Elm city | Brookhaven |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (8) | 0.8% (96) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (290) | 19.7% (2,281) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (182) | 11.7% (1,357) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (139) | 14.6% (1,696) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elm city vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Elm city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elm city hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 19.7% in Brookhaven.
- More residents in Elm city have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 11.7% in Brookhaven.
- In Brookhaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.5% in Elm city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.