Demographics details for Ellsworth, MI vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ellsworth, MI vs Greenville, MS.
Data | Ellsworth | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Population | 358 | 28,017 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 38.7 years |
Median Income | $56,250 | $35,148 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Ellsworth vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 358 in Ellsworth.
- Residents in Ellsworth have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 38.7 years in Greenville.
- Ellsworth has a higher median income of $56,250 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ellsworth at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 10% in Ellsworth.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Ellsworth.
Demographics
Demographics Ellsworth vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ellsworth | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 87 |
White | 90 | 11 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ellsworth vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 4% in Ellsworth.
- Ellsworth has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- Both Ellsworth and Greenville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ellsworth at 1% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ellsworth at 4% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ellsworth and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ellsworth | Greenville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 16.3% |
Depression | 24.9% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 26.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 10.6% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 46.0% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ellsworth vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.2% in Ellsworth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ellsworth at 24.9% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 15.6% in Ellsworth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ellsworth at 19.3% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 34.3% in Ellsworth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Ellsworth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ellsworth | Greenville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (1) | 1.8% (501) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (70) | 20.2% (5,661) |
Less than High School | 2.2% (8) | 15.5% (4,352) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (51) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ellsworth vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Ellsworth.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 19.6% in Ellsworth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenville at 15.5%, compared to 2.2% in Ellsworth.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 14.2% in Ellsworth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.