Demographics details for Ellensburg, WA vs Central falls, RI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ellensburg, WA vs Central falls, RI.

Data Ellensburg Central falls
Population 18,703 22,490
Median Age 24.9 years 31.5 years
Median Income $53,730 $43,092
Married Families 25.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 14% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 5.3

Population Comparison: Ellensburg vs Central falls

  • The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 18,703 in Ellensburg.
  • The median age in Central falls is higher at 31.5 years, compared to 24.9 years in Ellensburg.
  • Ellensburg has a higher median income of $53,730 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
  • In Central falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 25.0% in Ellensburg.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 14% in Ellensburg.
  • Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.1% in Ellensburg.

Demographics

Demographics Ellensburg vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ellensburg Central falls
Black 2 8
White 73 4
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 69
Two or More Races 10 18
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Ellensburg vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Ellensburg.
  • Ellensburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Ellensburg at 2% compared to 0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 12% in Ellensburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 10% in Ellensburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ellensburg and Central falls at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ellensburg Central falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 17.4%
Depression 26.9% 26.7%
Smoking 16.4% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 14.2%
Obesity 32.3% 40.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ellensburg vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.5% in Ellensburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ellensburg at 26.9% compared to 26.7% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 16.4% in Ellensburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ellensburg at 17.0% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 32.3% in Ellensburg.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Ellensburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ellensburg Central falls
No Schooling 0.5% (88) 4.7% (1,048)
High School Diploma 7.9% (1,483) 15.1% (3,406)
Less than High School 5.0% (941) 44.1% (9,911)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.9% (4,285) 5.6% (1,270)

Education Levels Comparison: Ellensburg vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.5% in Ellensburg.
  • In Central falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 7.9% in Ellensburg.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 5.0% in Ellensburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ellensburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.