Demographics details for Ellaville, GA vs Woodburn, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ellaville, GA vs Woodburn, OR.
| Data | Ellaville | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,546 | 27,290 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $58,916 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Ellaville vs Woodburn
- The population in Woodburn is higher at 27,290, compared to 1,546 in Ellaville.
- Residents in Ellaville have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916, compared to $50,000 in Ellaville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ellaville at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- Ellaville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Woodburn.
- The unemployment rate in Ellaville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Ellaville vs Woodburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ellaville | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 22 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ellaville vs Woodburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ellaville at 32% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Ellaville has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- In Woodburn, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ellaville.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 2% in Ellaville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodburn at 17%, compared to 3% in Ellaville.
- In Woodburn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ellaville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ellaville | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ellaville vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Ellaville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodburn at 27.1% versus 22.2% in Ellaville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ellaville at 20.8% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ellaville at 14.8% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 40.2% in Ellaville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ellaville and Woodburn at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ellaville | Woodburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (36) | 3.6% (992) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (270) | 13.3% (3,628) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (332) | 38.2% (10,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (196) | 9.4% (2,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ellaville vs Woodburn
- In Woodburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.3% in Ellaville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodburn at 38.2%, compared to 21.5% in Ellaville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.