Demographics details for Ellaville, GA vs Graham, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ellaville, GA vs Graham, NC.
| Data | Ellaville | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,546 | 17,856 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $51,482 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ellaville vs Graham
- The population in Graham is higher at 17,856, compared to 1,546 in Ellaville.
- Residents in Ellaville have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 36.8 years in Graham.
- Graham has a higher median income of $51,482, compared to $50,000 in Ellaville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ellaville at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Graham.
- Ellaville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Graham.
- The unemployment rate in Ellaville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Graham.
Demographics
Demographics Ellaville vs Graham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ellaville | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 23 |
| White | 63 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ellaville vs Graham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ellaville at 32% compared to 23% in Graham.
- Ellaville has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 51% in Graham.
- In Graham, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ellaville.
- Graham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Ellaville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Graham at 8%, compared to 3% in Ellaville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ellaville and Graham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ellaville | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ellaville vs Graham
- More residents in Ellaville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Graham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graham at 25.2% versus 22.2% in Ellaville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ellaville at 20.8% compared to 20.5% in Graham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graham at 15.9% compared to 14.8% in Ellaville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ellaville at 40.2% compared to 38.9% in Graham.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ellaville and Graham at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ellaville | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (36) | 1.3% (227) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (270) | 16.7% (2,976) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (332) | 16.2% (2,884) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (196) | 14.6% (2,610) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ellaville vs Graham
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.3% in Graham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in Graham.
- More residents in Ellaville have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 16.2% in Graham.
- In Graham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 12.7% in Ellaville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.