Demographics details for Ellaville, GA vs Earl park, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ellaville, GA vs Earl park, IN.
| Data | Ellaville | Earl park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,546 | 362 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 50.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $62,750 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ellaville vs Earl park
- In Ellaville, the population is higher at 1,546, compared to 362 in Earl park.
- The median age in Earl park is higher at 50.6 years, compared to 39.6 years in Ellaville.
- Earl park has a higher median income of $62,750, compared to $50,000 in Ellaville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Ellaville and Earl park at 38.0%.
- Ellaville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Earl park.
- The unemployment rate in Ellaville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Earl park.
Demographics
Demographics Ellaville vs Earl park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ellaville | Earl park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 1 |
| White | 63 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ellaville vs Earl park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ellaville at 32% compared to 1% in Earl park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earl park at 89% compared to 63% in Ellaville.
- Both Ellaville and Earl park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Earl park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Ellaville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Earl park at 6%, compared to 3% in Ellaville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ellaville and Earl park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ellaville | Earl park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 28.0% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ellaville vs Earl park
- In Earl park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.8% in Ellaville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Earl park at 28.0% versus 22.2% in Ellaville.
- Earl park has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 20.8% in Ellaville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earl park at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Ellaville.
- Earl park has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 40.2% in Ellaville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Earl park at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Ellaville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ellaville | Earl park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (36) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (270) | 21.5% (78) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (332) | 11.6% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (196) | 8.8% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ellaville vs Earl park
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Earl park.
- In Earl park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 17.5% in Ellaville.
- More residents in Ellaville have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 11.6% in Earl park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ellaville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 8.8% in Earl park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.