Demographics details for Elkmont, AL vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elkmont, AL vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Elkmont | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 430 | 142 |
| Median Age | 51.4 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $42,917 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Elkmont vs Griffin
- In Elkmont, the population is higher at 430, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Elkmont have a higher median age of 51.4 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $42,917 in Elkmont.
- In Griffin, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in Elkmont.
- Elkmont has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Elkmont.
Demographics
Demographics Elkmont vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elkmont | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 90 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elkmont vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Elkmont at 4% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 90% in Elkmont.
- Both Elkmont and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elkmont at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Elkmont at 3% compared to 2% in Griffin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Elkmont at 1% compared to 0% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elkmont | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elkmont vs Griffin
- More residents in Elkmont report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.2% in Griffin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 24.5% in Elkmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elkmont at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 15.6% in Elkmont.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 37.7% in Elkmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Elkmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elkmont | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (3) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (51) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (58) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (87) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elkmont vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Elkmont.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 11.9% in Elkmont.
- More residents in Elkmont have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.