Demographics details for Elkhart, IN vs Wadesboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elkhart, IN vs Wadesboro, NC.
Data | Elkhart | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,801 | 4,966 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $46,534 | $32,022 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Elkhart vs Wadesboro
- In Elkhart, the population is higher at 53,801, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- The median age in Wadesboro is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 34.5 years in Elkhart.
- Elkhart has a higher median income of $46,534 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elkhart at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- Elkhart has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Elkhart is higher at 5.5%, compared to 5.0% in Wadesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Elkhart vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Elkhart | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 70 |
White | 53 | 25 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 26 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elkhart vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 12% in Elkhart.
- Elkhart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Elkhart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elkhart at 26% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Elkhart at 8% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elkhart and Wadesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Elkhart | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.7% |
Depression | 26.6% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 22.5% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 41.5% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elkhart vs Wadesboro
- More residents in Elkhart report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Wadesboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elkhart at 26.6% compared to 21.6% in Wadesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elkhart at 22.5% compared to 22.2% in Wadesboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wadesboro at 13.9% compared to 13.4% in Elkhart.
- Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 41.5% in Elkhart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Elkhart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Elkhart | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (638) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (11,303) | 19.2% (953) |
Less than High School | 21.9% (11,805) | 11.8% (587) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (5,742) | 9.5% (472) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elkhart vs Wadesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 19.2% in Wadesboro.
- More residents in Elkhart have less than a high school education at 21.9% compared to 11.8% in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.