Demographics details for Elkhart, IN vs Grayson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elkhart, IN vs Grayson, GA.
| Data | Elkhart | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,801 | 4,753 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $46,534 | $121,421 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Elkhart vs Grayson
- In Elkhart, the population is higher at 53,801, compared to 4,753 in Grayson.
- Residents in Elkhart have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421, compared to $46,534 in Elkhart.
- In Grayson, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 27.0% in Elkhart.
- Elkhart has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Grayson.
- The unemployment rate in Elkhart is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Grayson.
Demographics
Demographics Elkhart vs Grayson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elkhart | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 74 |
| White | 53 | 20 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elkhart vs Grayson
- In Grayson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 12% in Elkhart.
- Elkhart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- Both Elkhart and Grayson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elkhart at 26% compared to 4% in Grayson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Elkhart at 8% compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elkhart and Grayson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elkhart | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elkhart vs Grayson
- More residents in Elkhart report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elkhart at 26.6% compared to 17.5% in Grayson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elkhart at 22.5% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grayson at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Elkhart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elkhart at 41.5% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elkhart at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elkhart | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (638) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (11,303) | 14.8% (703) |
| Less than High School | 21.9% (11,805) | 6.4% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (5,742) | 24.7% (1,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elkhart vs Grayson
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkhart hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 14.8% in Grayson.
- More residents in Elkhart have less than a high school education at 21.9% compared to 6.4% in Grayson.
- In Grayson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 10.7% in Elkhart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.