Demographics details for Elk horn, IA vs Snoqualmie, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elk horn, IA vs Snoqualmie, WA.
| Data | Elk horn | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 619 | 13,621 |
| Median Age | 49.9 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,306 | $186,353 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Elk horn vs Snoqualmie
- The population in Snoqualmie is higher at 13,621, compared to 619 in Elk horn.
- Residents in Elk horn have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353, compared to $59,306 in Elk horn.
- In Snoqualmie, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 35.0% in Elk horn.
- Elk horn has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- The unemployment rate in Elk horn is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Elk horn vs Snoqualmie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elk horn | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 93 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elk horn vs Snoqualmie
- In Snoqualmie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
- Elk horn has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
- In Snoqualmie, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Elk horn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elk horn at 5% compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Snoqualmie at 7%, compared to 1% in Elk horn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Elk horn at 1% compared to 0% in Snoqualmie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elk horn | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elk horn vs Snoqualmie
- More residents in Elk horn report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Snoqualmie at 23.9% versus 18.0% in Elk horn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elk horn at 16.3% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Elk horn at 22.9% compared to 19.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elk horn at 35.9% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elk horn at 8.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elk horn | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (117) | 5.8% (792) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (44) | 1.5% (209) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (95) | 45.3% (6,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elk horn vs Snoqualmie
- In Snoqualmie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Elk horn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elk horn hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents in Elk horn have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- In Snoqualmie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 15.3% in Elk horn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.