Demographics details for Elk city, KS vs Fayetteville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Elk city, KS vs Fayetteville, GA.

Data Elk city Fayetteville
Population 257 19,687
Median Age 45.9 years 43.4 years
Median Income $31,250 $79,865
Married Families 52.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 14% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Elk city vs Fayetteville

  • The population in Fayetteville is higher at 19,687, compared to 257 in Elk city.
  • Residents in Elk city have a higher median age of 45.9 years compared to 43.4 years in Fayetteville.
  • Fayetteville has a higher median income of $79,865, compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Elk city at 52.0% compared to 40.0% in Fayetteville.
  • Elk city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Fayetteville.
  • The unemployment rate in Elk city is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Fayetteville.

Demographics

Demographics Elk city vs Fayetteville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Elk city Fayetteville
Black Data is updating 39
White 87 45
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 5 6
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Elk city vs Fayetteville

  • In Fayetteville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 0% in Elk city.
  • Elk city has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 45% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Elk city.
  • Fayetteville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Elk city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Elk city at 8% compared to 5% in Fayetteville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elk city and Fayetteville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Elk city Fayetteville
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 9.6%
Depression 22.6% 19.1%
Smoking 19.5% 12.6%
Binge Drinking 19.7% 15.8%
Obesity 41.7% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Elk city vs Fayetteville

  • More residents in Elk city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Fayetteville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Elk city at 22.6% compared to 19.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Elk city at 19.5% compared to 12.6% in Fayetteville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 15.8% in Fayetteville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Elk city at 41.7% compared to 30.1% in Fayetteville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in Fayetteville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Elk city Fayetteville
No Schooling 0.8% (2) 0.5% (106)
High School Diploma 21.8% (56) 15.6% (3,062)
Less than High School 13.6% (35) 4.8% (937)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.5% (9) 25.1% (4,939)

Education Levels Comparison: Elk city vs Fayetteville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Elk city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Elk city hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 15.6% in Fayetteville.
  • More residents in Elk city have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 4.8% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 3.5% in Elk city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.