Demographics details for Elk city, KS vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elk city, KS vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Elk city | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 257 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 45.9 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $31,250 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Elk city vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 257 in Elk city.
- Residents in Elk city have a higher median age of 45.9 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elk city at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 14% in Elk city.
- The unemployment rate in Elk city is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Elk city vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elk city | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 87 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Elk city vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- Elk city has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- Both Elk city and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Elk city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 8% in Elk city.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Elk city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elk city | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elk city vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Elk city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 22.6% in Elk city.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 19.5% in Elk city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elk city at 41.7% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elk city | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 21.8% (56) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (35) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.5% (9) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elk city vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Elk city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 21.8% in Elk city.
- More residents in Elk city have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 3.5% in Elk city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.