Demographics details for Elk city, KS vs Cave creek, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elk city, KS vs Cave creek, AZ.
| Data | Elk city | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 257 | 5,135 |
| Median Age | 45.9 years | 58.1 years |
| Median Income | $31,250 | $90,824 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Elk city vs Cave creek
- The population in Cave creek is higher at 5,135, compared to 257 in Elk city.
- The median age in Cave creek is higher at 58.1 years, compared to 45.9 years in Elk city.
- Cave creek has a higher median income of $90,824, compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
- In Cave creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 52.0% in Elk city.
- Elk city has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Cave creek.
- Cave creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Elk city.
Demographics
Demographics Elk city vs Cave creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elk city | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Elk city vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cave creek at 88% compared to 87% in Elk city.
- In Cave creek, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Elk city.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Elk city and Cave creek at 5%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Elk city at 8% compared to 4% in Cave creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elk city and Cave creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elk city | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 27.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elk city vs Cave creek
- More residents in Elk city report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.5% in Cave creek.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elk city at 22.6% compared to 20.0% in Cave creek.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elk city at 19.5% compared to 11.3% in Cave creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 19.5% in Cave creek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elk city at 41.7% compared to 27.7% in Cave creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Cave creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elk city | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 21.8% (56) | 11.5% (590) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (35) | 4.2% (218) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.5% (9) | 40.9% (2,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elk city vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Elk city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elk city hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 11.5% in Cave creek.
- More residents in Elk city have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
- In Cave creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 3.5% in Elk city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.