Demographics details for Elizabethton, TN vs Pittsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elizabethton, TN vs Pittsburg, CA.
Data | Elizabethton | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,244 | 77,572 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $44,252 | $98,408 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Elizabethton vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 77,572, compared to 14,244 in Elizabethton.
- Residents in Elizabethton have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $44,252 in Elizabethton.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Elizabethton.
- Elizabethton has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.5% in Elizabethton.
Demographics
Demographics Elizabethton vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Elizabethton | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 15 |
White | 86 | 9 |
Asian | 1 | 18 |
Hispanic | 3 | 43 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Elizabethton vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 6% in Elizabethton.
- Elizabethton has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Elizabethton.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 3% in Elizabethton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 14%, compared to 3% in Elizabethton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elizabethton and Pittsburg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Elizabethton | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 11.8% |
Depression | 31.5% | 16.7% |
Smoking | 25.0% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 28.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elizabethton vs Pittsburg
- More residents in Elizabethton report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elizabethton at 31.5% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elizabethton at 25.0% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 15.0% compared to 14.7% in Elizabethton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elizabethton at 39.1% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elizabethton at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Elizabethton | Pittsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (75) | 3.1% (2,439) |
High School Diploma | 17.7% (2,527) | 14.5% (11,263) |
Less than High School | 16.7% (2,377) | 23.3% (18,048) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (2,422) | 14.8% (11,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elizabethton vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.5% in Elizabethton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elizabethton hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 23.3%, compared to 16.7% in Elizabethton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elizabethton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.