Demographics details for El paso, TX vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El paso, TX vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
Data | El paso | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Population | 677,456 | 4,216 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $55,710 | $250,001 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus
- In El paso, the population is higher at 677,456, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in El paso.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $55,710 in El paso.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 35.0% in El paso.
- El paso has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in El paso is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics El paso vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | El paso | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 1 |
White | -18 | 67 |
Asian | 1 | 12 |
Hispanic | 82 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 30 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in El paso at 4% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to -18% in El paso.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in El paso.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El paso at 82% compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in El paso at 30% compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in El paso at 1% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | El paso | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 11.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 5.8% |
Depression | 22.6% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 6.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 37.6% | 21.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in El paso report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in El paso at 22.6% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in El paso at 15.2% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in El paso.
- Obesity rates are higher in El paso at 37.6% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in El paso at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | El paso | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (12,694) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (76,132) | 2.8% (117) |
Less than High School | 23.2% (157,021) | 2.0% (83) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (116,175) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in El paso have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in El paso hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in El paso have less than a high school education at 23.2% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 17.1% in El paso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.