Demographics details for El paso, TX vs Ho ho kus, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in El paso, TX vs Ho ho kus, NJ.

Data El paso Ho ho kus
Population 677,456 4,216
Median Age 33.7 years 43.0 years
Median Income $55,710 $250,001
Married Families 35.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 17% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.6 2.5

Population Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus

  • In El paso, the population is higher at 677,456, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
  • The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in El paso.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $55,710 in El paso.
  • In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 35.0% in El paso.
  • El paso has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
  • The unemployment rate in El paso is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.

Demographics

Demographics El paso vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic El paso Ho ho kus
Black 4 1
White -18 67
Asian 1 12
Hispanic 82 12
Two or More Races 30 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in El paso at 4% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to -18% in El paso.
  • In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in El paso.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in El paso at 82% compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in El paso at 30% compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in El paso at 1% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric El paso Ho ho kus
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 11.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 5.8%
Depression 22.6% 16.6%
Smoking 15.2% 6.9%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 19.6%
Obesity 37.6% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus

  • More residents in El paso report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
  • Depression is more prevalent in El paso at 22.6% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in El paso at 15.2% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in El paso.
  • Obesity rates are higher in El paso at 37.6% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • Disability percentages are higher in El paso at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level El paso Ho ho kus
No Schooling 1.9% (12,694) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.2% (76,132) 2.8% (117)
Less than High School 23.2% (157,021) 2.0% (83)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (116,175) 51.4% (2,167)

Education Levels Comparison: El paso vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of residents in El paso have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • A higher percentage of residents in El paso hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents in El paso have less than a high school education at 23.2% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 17.1% in El paso.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.