Demographics details for El dorado hills, CA vs Leesburg, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in El dorado hills, CA vs Leesburg, FL.

Data El dorado hills Leesburg
Population 49,082 29,178
Median Age 45.3 years 43.6 years
Median Income $156,126 $43,733
Married Families 54.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 4% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.4

Population Comparison: El dorado hills vs Leesburg

  • In El dorado hills, the population is higher at 49,082, compared to 29,178 in Leesburg.
  • Residents in El dorado hills have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 43.6 years in Leesburg.
  • El dorado hills has a higher median income of $156,126 compared to $43,733 in Leesburg.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in El dorado hills at 54.0% compared to 35.0% in Leesburg.
  • The poverty level is higher in Leesburg at 11%, compared to 4% in El dorado hills.
  • Leesburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.6% in El dorado hills.

Demographics

Demographics El dorado hills vs Leesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic El dorado hills Leesburg
Black 1 19
White 68 46
Asian 13 1
Hispanic 8 24
Two or More Races 10 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Leesburg

  • In Leesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 1% in El dorado hills.
  • El dorado hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 46% in Leesburg.
  • The Asian population is larger in El dorado hills at 13% compared to 1% in Leesburg.
  • Leesburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 8% in El dorado hills.
  • Both El dorado hills and Leesburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 10%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El dorado hills and Leesburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric El dorado hills Leesburg
Mental Health Not Good 13.9% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 13.0%
Depression 20.5% 21.1%
Smoking 8.7% 23.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.3%
Obesity 25.1% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Leesburg

  • In Leesburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.9% in El dorado hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leesburg at 21.1% versus 20.5% in El dorado hills.
  • Leesburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 8.7% in El dorado hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in El dorado hills at 18.9% compared to 14.3% in Leesburg.
  • Leesburg has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 25.1% in El dorado hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leesburg at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in El dorado hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level El dorado hills Leesburg
No Schooling 0.3% (148) 0.7% (209)
High School Diploma 6.6% (3,234) 21.5% (6,277)
Less than High School 3.0% (1,491) 11.4% (3,340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.4% (19,315) 11.7% (3,428)

Education Levels Comparison: El dorado hills vs Leesburg

  • In Leesburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in El dorado hills.
  • In Leesburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 6.6% in El dorado hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leesburg at 11.4%, compared to 3.0% in El dorado hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in El dorado hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 11.7% in Leesburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.