Demographics details for El dorado hills, CA vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El dorado hills, CA vs Hoover, AL.
Data | El dorado hills | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,082 | 92,435 |
Median Age | 45.3 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $156,126 | $101,765 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: El dorado hills vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 49,082 in El dorado hills.
- Residents in El dorado hills have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- El dorado hills has a higher median income of $156,126 compared to $101,765 in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in El dorado hills at 54.0% compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- The poverty level is higher in Hoover at 7%, compared to 4% in El dorado hills.
- The unemployment rate in El dorado hills is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics El dorado hills vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | El dorado hills | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 20 |
White | 68 | 67 |
Asian | 13 | 5 |
Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in El dorado hills.
- El dorado hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- The Asian population is larger in El dorado hills at 13% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El dorado hills at 8% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in El dorado hills at 10% compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El dorado hills and Hoover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | El dorado hills | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 8.6% |
Depression | 20.5% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 8.7% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 25.1% | 32.1% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.9% in El dorado hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 20.5% in El dorado hills.
- Hoover has a higher smoking rate at 11.0% compared to 8.7% in El dorado hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in El dorado hills at 18.9% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Hoover has higher obesity rates at 32.1% compared to 25.1% in El dorado hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hoover at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in El dorado hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | El dorado hills | Hoover |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (148) | 0.6% (583) |
High School Diploma | 6.6% (3,234) | 7.3% (6,787) |
Less than High School | 3.0% (1,491) | 3.8% (3,478) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.4% (19,315) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: El dorado hills vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in El dorado hills.
- In Hoover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.3% compared to 6.6% in El dorado hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hoover at 3.8%, compared to 3.0% in El dorado hills.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 39.4% in El dorado hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.