Demographics details for El dorado hills, CA vs Chickasha, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in El dorado hills, CA vs Chickasha, OK.

Data El dorado hills Chickasha
Population 49,082 16,549
Median Age 45.3 years 36.4 years
Median Income $156,126 $55,136
Married Families 54.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 4% 17%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.2

Population Comparison: El dorado hills vs Chickasha

  • In El dorado hills, the population is higher at 49,082, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
  • Residents in El dorado hills have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
  • El dorado hills has a higher median income of $156,126 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in El dorado hills at 54.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 4% in El dorado hills.
  • The unemployment rate in El dorado hills is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.

Demographics

Demographics El dorado hills vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic El dorado hills Chickasha
Black 1 6
White 68 71
Asian 13 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 8
Two or More Races 10 11
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in El dorado hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 68% in El dorado hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in El dorado hills at 13% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both El dorado hills and Chickasha at 8%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 10% in El dorado hills.
  • In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in El dorado hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric El dorado hills Chickasha
Mental Health Not Good 13.9% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 13.7%
Depression 20.5% 25.4%
Smoking 8.7% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 13.8%
Obesity 25.1% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: El dorado hills vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.9% in El dorado hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 20.5% in El dorado hills.
  • Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 8.7% in El dorado hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in El dorado hills at 18.9% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 25.1% in El dorado hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in El dorado hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level El dorado hills Chickasha
No Schooling 0.3% (148) 0.5% (78)
High School Diploma 6.6% (3,234) 22.5% (3,730)
Less than High School 3.0% (1,491) 13.1% (2,160)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.4% (19,315) 12.5% (2,066)

Education Levels Comparison: El dorado hills vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in El dorado hills.
  • In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 6.6% in El dorado hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 3.0% in El dorado hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in El dorado hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.