Demographics details for El campo, TX vs Waipahu, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El campo, TX vs Waipahu, HI.
| Data | El campo | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,179 | 39,873 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $62,667 | $87,961 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: El campo vs Waipahu
- The population in Waipahu is higher at 39,873, compared to 12,179 in El campo.
- The median age in Waipahu is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.9 years in El campo.
- Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961, compared to $62,667 in El campo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in El campo at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Waipahu.
- El campo has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Waipahu.
- The unemployment rate in El campo is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.6% in Waipahu.
Demographics
Demographics El campo vs Waipahu provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | El campo | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 29 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 67 |
| Hispanic | 52 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El campo vs Waipahu
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in El campo at 9% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- El campo has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 0% in El campo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El campo at 52% compared to 6% in Waipahu.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waipahu at 15%, compared to 10% in El campo.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El campo and Waipahu at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | El campo | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 10.2% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 22.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El campo vs Waipahu
- More residents in El campo report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Depression is more prevalent in El campo at 23.3% compared to 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Smoking is more prevalent in El campo at 19.0% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- Binge drinking is more common in El campo at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Waipahu.
- Obesity rates are higher in El campo at 40.1% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- Disability percentages are higher in El campo at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | El campo | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (277) | 1.8% (729) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (1,760) | 22.1% (8,831) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (3,510) | 11.0% (4,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (1,240) | 13.0% (5,195) |
Education Levels Comparison: El campo vs Waipahu
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.8% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 14.5% in El campo.
- More residents in El campo have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 11.0% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 10.2% in El campo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.