Demographics details for El campo, TX vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El campo, TX vs Indian trail, NC.
| Data | El campo | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,179 | 41,724 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $62,667 | $95,101 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: El campo vs Indian trail
- The population in Indian trail is higher at 41,724, compared to 12,179 in El campo.
- The median age in Indian trail is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 35.9 years in El campo.
- Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $62,667 in El campo.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in El campo is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics El campo vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | El campo | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 9 |
| White | 29 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 52 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El campo vs Indian trail
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both El campo and Indian trail at 9%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 29% in El campo.
- In Indian trail, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in El campo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El campo at 52% compared to 11% in Indian trail.
- More residents identify as two or more races in El campo at 10% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El campo and Indian trail at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | El campo | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El campo vs Indian trail
- More residents in El campo report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
- Depression is more prevalent in El campo at 23.3% compared to 22.0% in Indian trail.
- Smoking is more prevalent in El campo at 19.0% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in El campo.
- Obesity rates are higher in El campo at 40.1% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
- Disability percentages are higher in El campo at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | El campo | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (277) | 0.7% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (1,760) | 12.8% (5,353) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (3,510) | 6.6% (2,761) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (1,240) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: El campo vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
- More residents in El campo have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 10.2% in El campo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.