Demographics details for El campo, TX vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El campo, TX vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | El campo | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,179 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $62,667 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: El campo vs Clarksdale
- The population in Clarksdale is higher at 13,969, compared to 12,179 in El campo.
- Residents in El campo have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- El campo has a higher median income of $62,667 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in El campo at 39.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 11% in El campo.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.2% in El campo.
Demographics
Demographics El campo vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | El campo | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 86 |
| White | 29 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 52 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El campo vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 9% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both El campo and Clarksdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El campo at 52% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in El campo at 10% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El campo and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | El campo | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El campo vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in El campo.
- Depression is more prevalent in El campo at 23.3% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 19.0% in El campo.
- Binge drinking is more common in El campo at 16.9% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 40.1% in El campo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in El campo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | El campo | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (277) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (1,760) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (3,510) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (1,240) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: El campo vs Clarksdale
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 2.0% in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in El campo have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
- In Clarksdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 10.2% in El campo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.