Demographics details for El campo, TX vs Chauncey, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El campo, TX vs Chauncey, OH.
| Data | El campo | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,179 | 949 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 45.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,667 | $33,803 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: El campo vs Chauncey
- In El campo, the population is higher at 12,179, compared to 949 in Chauncey.
- The median age in Chauncey is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 35.9 years in El campo.
- El campo has a higher median income of $62,667 compared to $33,803 in Chauncey.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in El campo at 39.0% compared to 24.0% in Chauncey.
- The poverty level is higher in Chauncey at 12%, compared to 11% in El campo.
- The unemployment rate in El campo is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Chauncey.
Demographics
Demographics El campo vs Chauncey provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | El campo | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | Data is updating |
| White | 29 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 52 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: El campo vs Chauncey
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in El campo at 9% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chauncey at 99% compared to 29% in El campo.
- Both El campo and Chauncey have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El campo at 52% compared to 0% in Chauncey.
- More residents identify as two or more races in El campo at 10% compared to 1% in Chauncey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El campo and Chauncey at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | El campo | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El campo vs Chauncey
- In Chauncey, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in El campo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chauncey at 28.3% versus 23.3% in El campo.
- Chauncey has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 19.0% in El campo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chauncey at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in El campo.
- Obesity rates are higher in El campo at 40.1% compared to 38.9% in Chauncey.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chauncey at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in El campo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | El campo | Chauncey |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (277) | 1.5% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (1,760) | 27.6% (262) |
| Less than High School | 28.8% (3,510) | 19.9% (189) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (1,240) | 7.1% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: El campo vs Chauncey
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.5% in Chauncey.
- In Chauncey, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 14.5% in El campo.
- More residents in El campo have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 19.9% in Chauncey.
- A higher percentage of residents in El campo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 7.1% in Chauncey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.