Demographics details for El campo, TX vs Central falls, RI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in El campo, TX vs Central falls, RI.

Data El campo Central falls
Population 12,179 22,490
Median Age 35.9 years 31.5 years
Median Income $62,667 $43,092
Married Families 39.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 11% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.3

Population Comparison: El campo vs Central falls

  • The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 12,179 in El campo.
  • Residents in El campo have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • El campo has a higher median income of $62,667 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in El campo at 39.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 11% in El campo.
  • Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.2% in El campo.

Demographics

Demographics El campo vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic El campo Central falls
Black 9 8
White 29 4
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 52 69
Two or More Races 10 18
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: El campo vs Central falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in El campo at 9% compared to 8% in Central falls.
  • El campo has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • Both El campo and Central falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 52% in El campo.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 10% in El campo.
  • In Central falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in El campo.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric El campo Central falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 17.4%
Depression 23.3% 26.7%
Smoking 19.0% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 14.2%
Obesity 40.1% 40.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: El campo vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.5% in El campo.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 23.3% in El campo.
  • Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 19.0% in El campo.
  • Binge drinking is more common in El campo at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 40.1% in El campo.
  • Disability percentages are higher in El campo at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level El campo Central falls
No Schooling 2.3% (277) 4.7% (1,048)
High School Diploma 14.5% (1,760) 15.1% (3,406)
Less than High School 28.8% (3,510) 44.1% (9,911)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.2% (1,240) 5.6% (1,270)

Education Levels Comparison: El campo vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 2.3% in El campo.
  • In Central falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 14.5% in El campo.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 28.8% in El campo.
  • A higher percentage of residents in El campo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.