Demographics details for El cajon, CA vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in El cajon, CA vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | El cajon | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,414 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $64,128 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: El cajon vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 104,414 in El cajon.
- The median age in Gresham is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 35.6 years in El cajon.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $64,128 in El cajon.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in El cajon.
- El cajon has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Gresham.
- The unemployment rate in El cajon is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics El cajon vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | El cajon | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 48 | 55 |
| Asian | 4 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: El cajon vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in El cajon at 6% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gresham at 55% compared to 48% in El cajon.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in El cajon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in El cajon at 29% compared to 22% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 12% in El cajon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both El cajon and Gresham at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | El cajon | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 27.6% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: El cajon vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.7% in El cajon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 20.1% in El cajon.
- Gresham has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 15.6% in El cajon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 18.2% in El cajon.
- Gresham has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 27.6% in El cajon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gresham at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in El cajon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | El cajon | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (3,414) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (16,528) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 19.6% (20,453) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (16,057) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: El cajon vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of residents in El cajon have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in El cajon hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in El cajon have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 15.4% in El cajon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.