Demographics details for Ehrhardt, SC vs Cuyahoga falls, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ehrhardt, SC vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.
| Data | Ehrhardt | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 438 | 50,655 |
| Median Age | 63.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $35,923 | $67,922 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cuyahoga falls
- The population in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 50,655, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- Residents in Ehrhardt have a higher median age of 63.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Cuyahoga falls.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922, compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ehrhardt at 56.0% compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Ehrhardt has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The unemployment rate in Ehrhardt is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
Demographics
Demographics Ehrhardt vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ehrhardt | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 50 | 5 |
| White | 50 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ehrhardt at 50% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Ehrhardt.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 5%, compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ehrhardt and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ehrhardt | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cuyahoga falls
- More residents in Ehrhardt report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ehrhardt at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ehrhardt at 41.6% compared to 41.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ehrhardt | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (13) | 1.6% (825) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (118) | 19.4% (9,813) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (103) | 6.3% (3,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.2% (119) | 26.1% (13,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ehrhardt vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.6% in Cuyahoga falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 19.4% in Cuyahoga falls.
- More residents in Ehrhardt have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ehrhardt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.2% compared to 26.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.